The forum is a place to speak about our games, make suggestions, report bugs, and so on. To post a message, you need to be logged in.


is mostly harmless

(schizo superuser)
"we apologise for the inconvenience"
Lives on deep thought
Last login: 83d 22h
Last forum reset: 358d
Membership: never

VP rules overhaul

Message 2242, 2768d 8h ago.
We are a small community, many of you have been around for years, so I feel I would be unfair if I imposed on you a VP rules overhaul without a little discussion first. I will definitely introduce some things like 1.5 spinners, but first I would like to redo the combat rules in a way that is slightly more mind-sized and varied.

Without entering in too much details as to why I am thinking of these changes, here are the rules I have been working on. Shots are solved in 4 steps.

1) Compute to-hit-threshold (THT). This is obtained by summing:
- The fighter's shields (current values will be translated in 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).
- Subtract the attacker's Gunnery/HMS.
- Add one for each hex-side the attacker has spun.
- Add something for each hex the defender has thrusted, depending on the Evasion (was: piloting) skill more or less as follows

Evasion 0 1 2 3 4
0 0 0 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 1 1
2 0 0 1 1 2
3 0 1 1 2 2
4 0 1 2 2 3

For example, the defender has 6-points shields (+6) and thrusts twice at piloting skill 3 (+1) and is shot at by an attaccker with 2 gunnery/HMS (-2) that has spinned twice (+1). THT: 8.

2) The attacker checks the dice s/he has to roll on the following table
for example, an OFC 6 at range 5 rolls 6d6*.

3) Die rolls are open-ended. When rolling a dX*, when you roll X, you can add another (dX-1), and repeat until you keep rolling X. That is, when rolling a d6, when you roll 6, you can add another d6-1, and keep adding as long as you roll 6.

In the above example, the attacker has to roll 8 with 6d6*. He rolls 6d6, and gets: 1, 3, 4, 2, 6, and 6. The first four rolls are misses. The last two are re-rolled, and a 1 and a 4 is rolled, giving a total of 6 and 9 (6+1-1 and 6+4-1). One miss, and one hit.

4) This is straightforward: the attacker hits once, and deals one point of damage for each roll >= THT. Rules on crits and shields damage will follow.


Effects on interface, which will be a bit simpler:
- "Sturdiness" will go away.
- The thrust chits will contain a number with fighter's total THT effect of shields, Evasion skill and number of thrusts done. In the above example, the defender will have four thrust chits, with THT numbers +7, +7, +8, +8. (+6 if no chit is played)
- The spin chits will contain a number with the fighter's total THT effect of gunnery and spinning. In the above example, the defender will have spin chits with THT attack numbers of -1, 0, +1, +2 (-2 if no chit is played)


Effects on fighters construction rules:
- Shields will be translated to values ranging from around 4 to around 8.
- Armour will be divided by ten, giving values between 1 and 20.
- Possibly, armour locations will be introduced for front/cockpit (60), left (90), right (90), thrusters (120).
- Weapons will be identified by just two values (size and angle) instead of three (damage, range, angle). 6-range weapons will deal a maximum damage of 6, for example. 3-points, 5-points and 7-points weapons will be made available.
- Additionally, cockpits, which currently contain 3 different values (gmax, hms/gunnery, piloting) will be separated in different items: HMS (gunnery) and cockpit (evasion) can be bought as items, and combined with gmax, gunnery and evasion, which will be racial and campaign skills.


Effects on game balance.
- I am carefully making computations to keep the game somewhat balanced, although this isn't a major preoccupation since, as you know, variable prices and ELO keep things balanced anyway.
- A major impact will be that d4* and d6* (which replace old accuracies in the range of 10%-40%) will have a much increased chance of hitting, or a much decreased one, depending on THT.
- This means that shields, evasion and gunnery will have a major impact on OFC and QGP accuracies.
- This will provide some kind of rationale for why Imperian pilots have high gunnery (since they favour OFC and QGP) and Comcon pilots have low gunnery (since they prefer LB and lasers).
- My balancing spreadsheet is available for the mathematically inclined on request.
threadpostedtopic startersubject
2729d 2768d 8hneko VP rules overhaul
|‣ 2768d 8hneko VP rules overhaul
|—‣ 2768d 8hneko VP rules overhaul
| ⌊‣ 2768d 7hAshayRey VP rules overhaul
⌊———‣ 2768d 6hBlckKnght VP rules overhaul
    ⌊‣ 2729dSlightlycrazy VP rules overhaul


It is understood that in submitting material (like suggestions, comments and proposals on our games) on this forum you are giving up any copyright claims, allowing us at to freely display, copy, distribute, alter, transform, and build on this material, for the purpose of improving our site and games. We cannot guarantee that all proposals and requests will be developed, of course. In addition, we cannot guarantee that your contribution will be credited esplicitly, though we usually try to do that. However, we intend to keep the forum publicly available, so other players will always be able to know how and when you contributed to this site's growth. It is understood that we will make use of your suggestions to improve the site to the best of our abilities and time available. Your contributions will be rewarded with big smiles, , warm hugs, and no money.